Feeling up the Pages

Did that get your attention?

Whenever I show my Kindle to people, I inevitably get a few “oohs” and “aaahs” as they flip the unit around in their hands and try to use it as if it were a laptop or a touchscreen smartphone. They may bemoan the fact that there is no backlight which is EXACTLY what makes the Kindle so easy on the eyes; it doesn’t glow. They flip it around in their hands, lose my page in about 5 books and then hand it back to me with a conclusive “I prefer the feel of real paper.” Oh, OK. That totally sums it up. Thank you.

Here is what I have said in the past and want another chance to say it again. To the people who prefer the feel of real paper (as if I prefer the feel of plastic and electronics) I ask a simple question: Do you enjoy the sound of live music? Do you get excited when U2 is coming to your town or your local symphony orchestra will include a Mahler repertoire that you have been dying to hear? If they have answered yes to this question, then I simply ask them if this love of live music stops them in any way from purchasing a CD or an MP3 from ITunes. If it hasn’t, then why eschew a digital book because you prefer real paper?

Don’t get me wrong, I know the analogy is not precise. I understand that the commitment to attend a concert is typically greater than purchasing a novel. I own 300 CDs (I have a feeling I will have to explain what a CD is one day soon) and yet I have not seen 300 concerts in my life. A concert is much for of an event than picking a book off a shelf. Not to mention the cost differential. It costs about the same to purchase a digital book vs a “real” book but it usually costs substantially more to attend a concert than it does to order a song off Itunes.

But the point stays the same; The fact that I TOO prefer the feel of a paper book (as well as attending live concerts) should not prevent me from opportunities of the digital age. What are those advantages?

A. I currently have about 30 books on my Kindle and a subscription to the New Yorker (shamefully unread) all taking up the same physical space as a single paperback novel.
B. I will always be able to select a book based on mood. How many times have you had a book in your hand and thought to yourself that this was not the book you were “in the mood for?”
C. I can be completely spontaneous. If I want a book, I connect to the Kindle’s whispernet and shop Amazon.com and download a book in about 60 seconds. This is perfect if I am at the airport and pass a Borders and something catches my eye.
D. I own 1000 books and 95% of them I will never open again. Not EVERY book needs to exist beyond the timeframe in which I am reading them. Of course, there are many sentimental books that I want to have a hard copy of (ie collectibles, gifts, sentimental books, etc), but those are far and few between. I just finished a trashy corporate espionage novel. Why would I want to keep a copy of that book around?
E. I really can’t say which is “greener;” a Kindle or a paperback, but I can confidently state that a Kindle uses less paper…lol.
F. As a side benefit, I can easily use the Kindle on the treadmill at the gym. I can adjust the font size and not have to worry about how to hold the book or magazine open. This has helped me immensely with my motivation to run.

So there it is. My justification for welcoming and embracing the digital book age. If this means that publishing houses go out of business (not sure that it does), then so be it. Blacksmiths are also out of business too.